Sunday, March 3, 2013

12 Things You May Not Know About Cannabis



March 1, 2013 | By  8 Replies
The majority of America has either decriminalized cannabis, or legalized it for medicinal purposes
It’s almost hard to believe when you consider how strong prohibition continues in most parts of the country, but 27 states in the U.S. have either decriminalized cannabis possession, legalized possession and state-licensed retail sales, legalized cannabis for medicinal purposes, or a combination of the three.
A breakdown of states that have decriminalized cannabis or legalized it for medical purposes.
A breakdown of states that have decriminalized cannabis or legalized it for medical purposes.
Cannabis is an ancient substance
The cannabis plant isn’t new, and neither is its usage. For example; pounds of cannabis have been found in Chinese tombs dating back thousands of years. Going even further back, cannabis is said to have co-evolved with humans, which is likely why it contains such intense medical value for our species. This indicates that the cannabis plant has followed us through most, if not all, our existence.
A Chinese tomb where pounds of cannabis was found.
A Chinese tomb where pounds of cannabis was found.

Cannabis may reduce infant mortality rates
In a drastically important, yet widely under-publicized study examining thousands of infants, those who had cannabis in their system had nearly half the rate of mortality; 8.9 deaths per 1,000, compared to 15.7. To some, especially those unfamiliar to cannabis as a medicine, this may sound a little far-fetched, but the numbers stand strong, and the study is the most comprehensive we have on the issue. We truly hope we see more in the future.
644bb1b0cfad6b412556e8abbc24e86b
A chart on the study from examiner.com.
The federal government sends out hundreds of cannabis joints to patients every month
To many legalization advocates this is nothing new, but to those who haven’t heard it before, it’s a shock. As part of a short-lived federal medical marijuana program (yes, the hypocrisy is thick as mud), four people who were grandfathered in receive 300 pre-rolled cannabis joints from the government every month. And they have for years.
The program’s initial existence, and the government’s continuation of supplying these joints, adds an odd layer to the current war on cannabis that sees the feds putting people in prison for years for far less than the 300 joints they supply to these individuals every month.
4 people receive a monthly cannister of joints from the U.S. government.
Four people receive a monthly canister of joints from the U.S. government.
America is one of the only “developed” nations that doesn’t permit the growing of industrial hemp
Over 30 nations across the world allow for hemp to be grown as an industrial commodity. According to congressional research from 2005, America is the only “developed” nation in the world that doesn’t allow it; although we allow for the sale and production of hemp products.
America is the only "developed" country to outlaw hemp production.
America is the only “developed” country to outlaw hemp production.
Hemp can be used to clean up nuclear disaster sites
A process called phytoremediation is used to clean areas suffering from immense nuclear contamination, by using plants to absorb the toxins out of the soil and water. Hemp is one of the most effective plants for this process, and has been used to clean contaminated soil around the world, at locations like Chernobyl.
The process of phytoremediation.
The process of phytoremediation.
Cannabis was once listed in the U.S. Pharmacopoeia
Cannabis was used as the primary ingredient in a variety of tinctures and concoctions prescribed by doctors for a myriad of maladies from 1850 up until 1942, when it was removed from the U.S. Pharmacopoeia – much to the protest of many physicians, including the American Medical Association.
Cannabis tincture from the early 1900's.
Legal cannabis tincture from over a century ago.
Medical marijuana reduces suicide rates
Recent studies have shown states that have legalized the usage of medical marijuana have seen a significant decrease in suicide rates. The most heavily impacted group were males ages 20-29, which saw an 11% decrease. In these same states, there was also a decrease in traffic fatalities.
Screen Shot 2012-02-07 at 9.18.05 AM

Hemp oil can be used to fuel cars
Although many people are aware of hemp’s use for things like clothing and rope, one capability is often overlooked: the plant’s ability to be processed into effective, environmentally-friendly biofuel. Hemp oil could easily replace most petroleum products, and it can even be used in place of gasoline to fuel vehicles.
This car has traveled over 13,000 miles on strictly hemp fuel.
This car has traveled over 13,000 miles on strictly hemp fuel.
The U.S. government owns a patent on marijuana compounds
Definitively hypocritical, and a sign that the government knows it’s lying and eventually wants the monopoly over cannabis as a medicine, the feds have patented multiple cannabis compounds, and cannabis-related pharmaceutical drugs. One such patent is for cannabis to be used as an antioxidant and neuroprotectant.
The government owns the patent to cannabis as an antioxidant and neuroprotectant.
The government owns the patent to cannabis as an antioxidant and neuroprotectant.

Your body produces its own endocannabinoids
Our body is made to accept cannabis as a therapeutic and medicinal substance. As humans, we have our own endocannabinoid system, as well as receptors; the primary reasons it’s so useful as a medicine.Breast milk, for example, is said to contain heavy amounts of naturally-produced endocannabinoids.
Our body produces its own endocannibnoids, and has receptors throughout our body.
Our body produces its own endocannabinoids, and has receptors throughout our body.
[ Editor's Note: Sources are hyper-linked throughout the article. ]
~~ Help Waking Times to raise the vibration by sharing this article with the buttons below…
- See more at: http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/03/01/12-things-you-may-not-know-about-cannabis/#sthash.BgyUtpdj.dpuf

Sustainability is Mainly a Spiritual Crisis, Not a Material One



February 28, 2013 | By  2 Replies
Caroline Savery, Sust EnableWaking Times
The more godlike he becomes, the less godly Homo economicus behaves.” - Andrew Nikiforuk
When I started out as a sustainability activist, I firmly believed that “sustainability” meant finding better, more efficient ways for humans to live within the means of our resources.  I considered the problem of sustainability as a problem of materials and design: too many humans, not enough global resources to fulfill our aspirations.  So, to fix this problem, we must design more efficient ways of fitting on the planet (a la Buckminster Fuller, of whose life work I was a faithful follower at the time.)
Over the course of four years, my definition of sustainability and subsequently, my life’s course, have been revolutionized many times.  I continue to actively integrate many diverse perspectives on sustainability into my life.  But perhaps the most significant thing I learned from my journey thus far is that our serious lack of sustainability is not strictly a materials problem.  It is mainly a problem of how we interpret the world in which we live.  Today we have very real material problems, such as ocean acidification and global warming, but these material manifestations are an effect of what is, at root, a spiritual crisis.  A spiritual crisis exemplified by the persistent assumption that the nature of reality is fundamentally objective and material.
Many people still harbor the belief that human beings are not, at our most basic level, living beings–that we are more accurately defined by our intellectual, artistic and technological pursuits, and that one day we will transcend our earthly limitations and jet off throughout space as sheer consciousness, utterly free.  Four years ago, I too believed that humans are vastly and uniquely more accomplished and intelligent than the rest of life–that we were “special,” and thus could play by our own rules.  I believed that with the same gumption and elbow grease we used to build our modern society, we will easily overcome the environmental management problems facing us.  In other words, I believed firmly in the supremacy of humankind.
Possibly the only reason I am not an evangelical “transhumanist” today is that I ended up putting my supremacist philosophies to the test, through embarking on an ambitious project to devise and then embody a universal formula (like a Theory of Everything) for 100% sustainable living, perfectly balancing the equation between Earth materials and human lives.  The formula would be so perfect that if every human reorganized their customs and applied this formula to their lives, everywhere on Earth, we would achieve total global perpetual sustainability–i.e., a sustainability utopia.
Of course, my initiative fantastically failed.
But I didn’t.  My consciousness (itself never short on gumption) rose from the ashes attempting to make sense of what all had happened to my grandiose project.  Which proved–if nothing else–that I am not my aspirations.  I am a living body who can survive–and indeed thrive–after the successes or failures of any of my projects.
We are–whether we deny it or not, whether we are consciously aware of it or not–living beings before we are anything else.  As such, we require the health of the ecosystem in which we are embedded to secure our own survival.  Our environment is made up of mostly living things: the atmospheric oxygen we require for life originated as a waste product of certain ubiquitous single-celled organisms; the food we consume is derived from pieces of the life cycles of plant and animal kingdoms, which rely on the soil to be healthy, which relies on predictable sun and water cycles, and so on and so forth.  We are intertwined with the success of all living things, not only our own–we secure our own best terms through securing theirs.
There are many tools–often labeled “spiritual”–for tapping into awareness of our living natures.  When we dwell in what some call “the moment,” we revisit our living, breathing, dynamic, and alive natures.  We transcend rational thought and directly experience ourselves as temporary yet essential embodiments of living, creative processes.  In these moments, the reality of our interconnected and inter-determinant natures percolates up to our consciousness, as clear as day.
Since the collapse of my “100% sustainable living” project, and as I began to realize that the entire project was based on frail, untested attitudes drilled into me by sociocultural norms, I chose to begin practicing a healthy doubt and distance with regard to my assumptions.  This inadvertently lead me to discover the spiritual dimension of life, which manifested for me in experiences best described by Buddhism, two years ago.  Since then, I practice cultivating a type of personal, self-delving practice defined not by the existence of external validation or “proof” of my beliefs, but rather by quality of observation and reflection.
Doing so has led me to ponder: why is it that all other living species manage to live and thrive according to the rules of their local ecosystems–yet certain widespread human behaviors cause a “hemorrhaging of life” in which we annihilate ourselves and other species through rapidly toxifying our environments?  Why is it that life diversifies and opportunity and creativity increase because each species adds additional niches to their environment–but we, of all creatures, are reversing life’s diversification trend?  We can put a man on the moon and multiple robots on Mars, but we cannot name even one-tenth of our planet’s inhabitants (of which at least 30% will be extinct in my lifetime due to human-caused environmental imbalances.)  Since we tend to look so favorably upon our role on planet Earth (that we are God’s chosen creatures, that we have contributed vast benefit to the planet through our arts and technologies since the dawning of civilization), I cannot fathom why or how we got to the point of failing so spectacularly to fulfill our most basic and essential functions in our ecosystems.  It’s like arrogantly believing we can pass the GRE’s before we even grasp the alphabet, or that we can design a rocketship before we even know how to count to two.  It’s like believing we are exceptional geniuses when we are actually deluded psychopaths.
But if all other creatures know how to live on this planet, we do, too.  We have, however, piled a bunch of psychic and experiential junk on top of such knowledge.  Assume for a moment that living sustainably is actually intrinsic to every living thing.  If we then trace the roots of how we learned to behave unsustainably, if we dig deeply into our own histories, we may find the answers to living sustainably are not far off, or lost in ancient times: they are right here with us.  You might even say that redeeming this insight and relearning the way to best live and thrive on the planet is our birthright as living things.  Living sustainably is likely to be a refinable art and technique that blossoms from its diversity of applications, but whose seed has already been planted long ago, in us, and we get to choose whether to cultivate it.
What will it take to unearth our built-in natures from beneath all the superfluous psychosocial baggage we continually wallow in like pigs in mud?  It will take a lot of work and faith.  It will seem overwhelming at times to have to face the fear, grief, shame, rage, and horror, to weather the cycle of hopes and hopes dashed, to keep on following the trail of the freedom and rejuvenation we feel that results from making holistic changes.  Since this–not geo- or bio- or nano- or social engineering–is really the work we must do to bring about a sustainable world, we need to make room for sharing our emotional and spiritual stories.  We need to make room for supporting one another, for practicing compassion, for practicing inclusiveness and dialog, for healing, for putting down our baggage without losing our minds.  Once we tweak how we view reality, and alter what we believe the world around us means, our worlds and realities change.  If humanity is indeed responsible for causing catastrophic environmental changes as they are now manifesting, this is but a material reality that has resulted from improper conduct as a living being.  And as our experiences testify: we know we can give up our assumptions.  What we may not give up is water, soil, air, and relationships.
Adjusting our interpretations of ourselves and the world–no matter how attached we are to such beliefs–will allow for less objectifying, more fulfilling relationships to our natural world.  In such a culture, it will be customary to define the natural world as more than just its physical, material, measurable contents.  This shift in how we interpret the world, from an “objective material” to a “multiplicitous relationships” perspective, is especially important if we wish to achieve sustainability.  If we dwell in the material realities rather than how we perceive and relate to them, we will become quickly mired in hopelessness.  How could we possibly survive an atmosphere this chock full of carbon?  How dare we even dream of surviving the chemical toxification wrought by 200 years of industrialism?  I’d venture to say that we simply cannot fairly or sustainably divide the world’s total (dwindling) resources by 7 billion humans (and counting).  Let’s be real.  We cannot make new air, trees, fresh water, or other such life support systems which are now desperately needed,without cooperating with nature’s intrinsic capacity to build such things.
Nuclear waste, plastics waste, toxic chemical byproducts of industrial processes, carbon emissions… one day, not too long ago, these issues were viewed as unfortunate but unimportant byproducts of humanity attaining its full potential.  Society’s focus was on the fulfillment of human potential–which fruits past generations eagerly reaped, and since this objective was viewed as central and even “objective”, any “byproducts” resulting from this orientation were either “not a problem” or “someone else’s problem.”
“Someone else’s problem” has now become our problem.  If it looks like we face a massive, intimidating complex of problems, that is because our problems are comprised of a constellation of subtler responsibilities deferred… to us.  We may not like the position we are in, but after we fret and grieve, it’s time to grow up and rise to the challenges.  In many indigenous cultures, initiation rites are used to mark the transition from childhood to adulthood.  As a culture, now is the time to take responsibility, to end the pattern of deferring our responsibilities.  If we’re grown up enough to contemplate the existence of other Earth-like planets in distant galaxies, we’re grown up enough clean up our own messes now.  If we seize this moment, and accept the task of these challenges, we may liberate positive change on scales and effects undreamed of.
And on a personal level, we can feel these changes.  As the seed of how to live sustainably is embedded in each of us, it is as though we each have an internal compass, whose guiding accuracy only increases the more we use it.  Answer your body’s call to do more meaningful work.  Drink from all the information around you (online and off), but make sure you put aside time for digestion and reflection.  Pursue the highest expression of yourself.  Offer your gifts to the world with enthusiasm and abandon.  Try to find the most perfect way to serve yourself while mutually serving others.
What does this have to do with sustainability?, you may ask.  Everything.  I say all this because I have a strong suspicion that if you focus your intentions on these personal-level, spiritually rewarding challenges, you will be participating in an overall sustainability surgewhether you consciously know it or not.  When we discard the behaviors and assumptions that are not serving us, make space for reflection, and cultivate self-love, adaptation occurs, consciously or unconsciously (as the rest of Life can attest).  When we make it our top priority to become whole again, the world does too.
- See more at: http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/02/28/sustainability-is-mainly-a-spiritual-crisis-not-a-material-one/#sthash.Ns8w1nQF.dpuf

10 Lies and Misconceptions Spread By Mainstream Nutrition



February 28, 2013 | By  3 Replies
There’s no shortage of health myths out there, but I believe the truth is slowly but surely starting to seep out there and get a larger audience. For example, two recent articles actually hit the nail right on the head in terms of good nutrition advice.
Shape Magazine features a slide show on “9 ingredients nutritionists won’t touch,”1 and authoritynutrition.com listed “11 of the biggest lies of mainstream nutrition.”2
These health topics are all essential to get “right” if you want to protect your health, and the health of your loved ones, which is why I was delighted to see both of these sources disseminating spot-on advice. I highly recommend reading through both of them.
Here, I will review my own top 10 lies and misconceptions of mainstream nutrition—some of which are included in the two featured sources, plus a few additional ones I believe are important.

Lie # 1: ‘Saturated Fat Causes Heart Disease’

As recently as 2002, the “expert” Food & Nutrition Board issued the following misguided statement, which epitomizes this myth:
“Saturated fats and dietary cholesterol have no known beneficial role in preventing chronic disease and are not required at any level in the diet.”
Similarly, the National Academies’ Institute of Medicine recommends adults to get 45–65 percent of their calories from carbohydrates, 20-35 percent from fat, and 10-35 percent from protein. This is an inverse ideal fat to carb ratio that is virtually guaranteed to lead you astray, and result in a heightened risk of chronic disease.
Most people benefit from 50-70 percent healthful fats in their diet for optimal health, whereas you need very few, if any, carbohydrates to maintain good health… Although that may seem like a lot, fat is much denser and consumes a much smaller portion of your meal plate.
This dangerous recommendation, which arose from an unproven hypothesisfrom the mid-1950s, has been harming your health and that of your loved ones for about 40 years now.
The truth is, saturated fats from animal and vegetable sources provide the building blocks for cell membranes and a variety of hormones and hormone-like substances, without which your body cannot function optimally. They also act as carriers for important fat-soluble vitamins A, D, E and K. Dietary fats are also needed for the conversion of carotene to vitamin A, for mineral absorption, and for a host of other biological processes.
In fact, saturated is the preferred fuel for your heart! For more information about saturated fats and the essential role they play in maintaining your health, please read my previous article The Truth About Saturated Fat.

Lie # 2: ‘Eating Fat Makes You Gain Weight’

The low-fat myth may have done more harm to the health of millions than any other dietary recommendation as the resulting low-fat craze led to increased consumption of trans-fats, which we now know increases your risk of obesity, diabetes and heart disease—the very health problems wrongfully attributed to saturated fats…
To end the confusion, it’s very important to realize that eating fat will not make you fat!
The primary cause of excess weight and all the chronic diseases associated with it, is actually the consumption of too much sugar — especially fructose, but also all sorts of grains, which rapidly convert to sugar in your body. If only the low-fat craze had been a low-sugar craze… then we wouldn’t have nearly as much chronic disease as we have today. For an explanation of why and how a low-fat diet can create the very health problems it’s claimed to prevent, please see this previous article.

Lie # 3: ‘Artificial Sweeteners are Safe Sugar-Replacements for Diabetics, and Help Promote Weight Loss’

Most people use artificial sweeteners to lose weight and/or because they’re diabetic and need to avoid sugar. The amazing irony is that nearly all the studies that have carefully analyzed their effectiveness show that those who use artificial sweeteners actually gain more weight than those who consume caloric sweeteners. Studies have also revealed that artificial sweeteners can be worse than sugar for diabetics.
In 2005, data gathered from the 25-year long San Antonio Heart Study showed that drinking dietsoft drinks increased the likelihood of serious weight gain, far more so than regular soda.3 On average, each diet soft drink the participants consumed per day increased their risk of becoming overweight by 65 percent within the next seven to eight years, and made them 41 percent more likely to become obese. There are several potential causes for this, including:
  • Sweet taste alone appears to increase hunger, regardless of caloric content.
  • Artificial sweeteners appear to simply perpetuate a craving for sweets, and overall sugar consumption is therefore not reduced—leading to further problems controlling your weight.4
  • Artificial sweeteners may disrupt your body’s natural ability to “count calories,” as evidenced in studies such as this 2004 study at Purdue University,5 which found that rats fed artificially sweetened liquids ate more high-calorie food than rats fed high-caloric sweetened liquids.
There is also a large number of health dangers associated with artificial sweeteners and aspartame in particular. I’ve compiled an ever-growing list of studies pertaining to health problems associated with aspartame, which you can find here. If you’re still on the fence, I highly recommend reviewing these studies for yourself so that you can make an educated decision. For more information on aspartame, the worst artificial sweetener, please see my aspartame video.

Lie # 4: ‘Your Body Cannot Tell the Difference Between Sugar and Fructose’

Of the many health-harming ingredients listed in the featured article by Shape Magazine—all of which you’re bound to get in excess if you consume processed foods—fructose is perhaps the greatest threat to your health. Mounting evidence testifies to the fact that excess fructose, primarily in the form of high fructose corn syrup (HFCS), is a primary factor causing not just obesity, but also chronic and lethal disease. In fact, I am convinced that fructose is one of the leading causes of a great deal of needless suffering from poor health and premature death.
Many conventional health “experts,” contend that sugar and fructose in moderation is perfectly okay and part of a normal “healthy” diet, and the corn industry vehemently denies any evidence showing that fructose is metabolically more harmful than regular sugar (sucrose). This widespread denial and sweeping the evidence under the carpet poses a massive threat to your health, unless you do your own research.
As a standard recommendation, I advise keeping your total fructose consumption below 25 grams per day. For most people it would also be wise to limit your fructose from fruit to 15 grams or less. Unfortunately, while this is theoretically possible, precious few people are actually doing that.
Cutting out a few desserts will not make a big difference if you’re still eating a “standard American diet”—in fact, I’ve previously written about how various foods and beverages contain far more sugar than a glazed doughnut. Because of the prevalence of HFCS in foods and beverages, the average person now consumes 1/3 of a pound of sugar EVERY DAY, which is five ounces or 150 grams, half of which is fructose.
That’s 300 percent more than the amount that will trigger biochemical havoc. Remember that is the AVERAGE; many actually consume more than twice that amount. For more details about the health dangers of fructose and my recommendations, please see my recent article Confirmed—Fructose Can Increase Your Hunger and Lead to Overeating.

Lie # 5: ‘Soy is a Health Food’

The meteoric rise of soy as a “health food” is a perfect example of how a brilliant marketing strategy can fool millions. But make no mistake about it, unfermented soy products are NOT healthful additions to your diet, and can be equally troublesome for men and women of all ages. If you find this recommendation startling then I would encourage you to review some of the many articles listed on my Soy Index Page.
Contrary to popular belief, thousands of studies have actually linked unfermented soy to malnutrition, digestive distress, immune-system breakdown, thyroid dysfunction, cognitive decline, reproductive disorders and infertility—even cancer and heart disease.

Not only that, but more than 90 percent of American soy crops are genetically modified, which carries its own set of health risks.6 I am not opposed to all soy, however. Organic and, most importantly, properly fermented soy does have great health benefits. Examples of such healthful fermented soy products include tempeh, miso and natto. Here is a small sampling of the detrimental health effects linked to unfermented soy consumption:
Breast cancerBrain damageInfant abnormalities
Thyroid disordersKidney stonesImmune system impairment
Severe, potentially fatal food allergiesImpaired fertilityDanger during pregnancy and breastfeeding

Lie # 6: ‘Eggs are a Source of Unhealthy Cholesterol’

Eggs are probably one of the most demonized foods in the United States, mainly because of the misguided idea implied by the lipid hypothesis that eating egg yolk increases the cholesterol levels in your body. You can forget about such concerns, because contrary to popular belief, eggs are one of the healthiest foods you can eat and they do not have a detrimental impact on cholesterol levels. Numerous nutritional studies have dispelled the myth that you should avoid eating eggs, so this recommendation is really hanging on by a very bare thread…
One such study7conducted by the Yale Prevention Research Center and published in 2010, showed that egg consumption did not have a negative effect on endothelial function – a measure of cardiac risk – and did not cause a spike on cholesterol levels. The participants of the Yale study ate two eggs per day for a period of six weeks. There are many benefits associated with eggs, including:
One egg contains 6 grams of high quality protein and all 9 essential amino acidsEggs are good for your eyes because they contain lutein and zeaxanthin, antioxidants found in your lens and retina. These two compounds help protect your eyes from damage caused by free radicals and avoid eye diseases like macular degeneration and cataractsEggs are a good source of choline (one egg contains about 300 micrograms), a member of the vitamin B family essential for the normal function of human cells and helps regulate the nervous and cardiovascular systems. Choline is especially beneficial for pregnant mothers as it is influences normal brain development of the unborn child
Eggs are one of the few foods that contain naturally occurring vitamin D (24.5 grams)Eggs may help promote healthy hair and nails due to their high sulphur contentEggs also contain biotin, calcium, copper, folate, iodine, iron, manganese, magnesium, niacin, potassium, selenium, sodium, thiamine, vitamin A, vitamin B2, vitamin B12, vitamin E and zinc
Choose free-range organic eggs, and avoid “omega-3 eggs” as this is not the proper way to optimize your omega-3 levels. To produce these omega-3 eggs, the hens are usually fed poor-quality sources of omega-3 fats that are already oxidized. Omega-3 eggs are more perishable than non-omega-3 eggs.

Lie # 7: ‘Whole Grains are Good for Everyone’

The use of whole-grains is an easy subject to get confused on especially for those who have a passion for nutrition, as for the longest time we were told the fiber in whole grains is highly beneficial. Unfortunately ALL grains, including whole-grain and organic varieties, can elevate your insulin levels, which can increase your risk of disease. They also contain gluten, which many are sensitive to, if not outright allergic. It has been my experience that more than 85 percent of Americans have trouble controlling their insulin levels — especially those who have the following conditions:
  • Overweight
  • Diabetes
  • High blood pressure
  • High cholesterol
  • Protein metabolic types
In addition, sub-clinical gluten intolerance is far more common than you might think, which can also wreak havoc with your health. As a general rule, I strongly recommend eliminating or at least restricting grains as well as sugars/fructose from your diet, especially if you have any of the above conditions that are related to insulin resistance. The higher your insulin levels and the more prominent your signs of insulin overload are, the more ambitious your grain elimination needs to be.
If you are one of the fortunate ones without insulin resistance and of normal body weight, then grains are fine, especially whole grains—as long as you don’t have any issues with gluten and select organic and unrefined forms. It is wise to continue to monitor your grain consumption and your health as life is dynamic and constantly changing. What might be fine when you are 25 or 30 could become a major problem at 40 when your growth hormone and level of exercise is different.

Lie # 8: ‘Milk Does Your Body Good’

Unfortunately, the myth that conventional pasteurized milk has health benefits is a persistent one, even though it’s far from true. Conventional health agencies also refuse to address the real dangers of the growth hormones and antibiotics found in conventional milk. I do not recommend drinking pasteurized milk of any kind, including organic, because once milk has been pasteurized its physical structure is changed in a way that can actually cause allergies and immune problems.
Important enzymes like lactase are destroyed during the pasteurization process, which causes many people to not be able to digest milk. Additionally, vitamins (such as A, C, B6 and B12) are diminished and fragile milk proteins are radically transformed from health nurturing to unnatural amino acid configurations that can actually worsen your health. The eradication of beneficial bacteria through the pasteurization process also ends up promoting pathogens rather than protecting you from them.
The healthy alternative to pasteurized milk is raw milk, which is an outstanding source of nutrients including beneficial bacteria such as lactobacillus acidophilus, vitamins and enzymes, and it is, in my estimation, one of the finest sources of calcium available. For more details please watch the interview I did with Mark McAfee, who is the owner of Organic Pastures, the largest organic dairy in the US.
However, again, if you have insulin issues and are struggling with weight issues, high blood pressure, diabetes, cancer or high cholesterol it would be best to restrict your dairy to organic butter as the carbohydrate content, lactose, could be contribute to insulin and leptin resistance. Fermented organic raw dairy would eliminate the lactose issue and would be better tolerated. But if you are sensitive to dairy it might be best to avoid these too.

Lie # 9: ‘Genetically Engineered Foods are Safe and Comparable to Conventional Foods’

Make no mistake about it; genetically engineered (GE) foods may be one of the absolute most dangerous aspects of our food supply today. I strongly recommend avoiding ALL GE foods. Since over 90 percent of all corn grown in the US is GE corn, and over 95 percent all soy is GE soy, this means that virtually every processed food you encounter at your local supermarket that does not bear the “USDA Organic” label likely contains one or more GE components. To avoid GE foods, first memorize the following list of well-known and oft-used GE crops:
CornCanolaAlfalfa (New GM crop as of 2011)
SoyCottonseedSugar derived from sugar beets
Fresh zucchini, crookneck squash and Hawaiian papaya are also commonly GE. It’s important to realize that unless you’re buying all organic food, or grow your own veggies and raise your own livestock, or at the very least buy all whole foods (even if conventionally grown) and cook everything from scratch, chances are you’re consuming GE foods every single day… What ultimate impact these foods will have on your health is still unknown, but increased disease, infertility and birth defects appear to be on the top of the list of most likely side effects. The first-ever lifetime feeding study also showed a dramatic increase in organ damage, cancer, and reduced lifespan.

Lie # 10: ‘Lunch Meats Make for a Healthy Nutritious Meal’

Lastly, processed meats, which includes everything from hot dogs, deli meats, bacon, and pepperoni are rarely thought of as strict no-no’s, but they really should be, if you’re concerned about your health. Virtually all processed meat products contain dangerous compounds that put them squarely on the list of foods to avoid or eliminate entirely. These compounds include:
  • Heterocyclic amines (HCAs): a potent carcinogen, which is created when meat or fish is cooked at high temperatures.
  • Sodium nitrite: a commonly used preservative and antimicrobial agent that also adds color and flavor to processed and cured meats.
  • Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): Many processed meats are smoked as part of the curing process, which causes PAHs to form.
  • Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs): When food is cooked at high temperatures—including when it is pasteurized or sterilized—it increases the formation of AGEs in your food. AGEs build up in your body over time leading to oxidative stress, inflammation and an increased risk of heart disease, diabetes and kidney disease.
This recommendation is backed up by a report commissioned by The World Cancer Research Fund8 (WCRF). The review, which evaluated the findings of more than 7,000 clinical studies, was funded by money raised from the general public, so the findings were not influenced by vested interests. It’s also the biggest review of the evidence ever undertaken, and it confirms previous findings: Processed meats increase your risk of cancer, especially bowel cancer, and NO amount of processed meat is “safe.” A previous analysis by the WCRF found that eating just one sausage a day raises your risk of developing bowel cancer by 20 percent, and other studies have found that processed meats increase your risk of:
  • Colon cancer by 50 percent
  • Bladder cancer by 59 percent
  • Stomach cancer by 38 percent
  • Pancreatic cancer by 67 percent
Processed meats may also increase your risk of diabetes by 50 percent, and lower your lung function and increase your risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). If you absolutely want or need a hot dog or other processed meats once in awhile, you can reduce your risk by:
  • Looking for “uncured” varieties that contain NO nitrates
  • Choosing varieties that say 100% beef, 100% chicken, etc. This is the only way to know that the meat is from a single species and does not include byproducts (like chicken skin or chicken fat or other parts)
  • Avoiding any meat that contains MSG, high-fructose corn syrup, preservatives, artificial flavor or artificial color
Ideally, purchase sausages and other processed meats from a small, local farmer who can tell you exactly what’s in their products. These are just some of the health myths and misconceptions out there. There are certainly many more. The ones listed above are some of the most important ones, in my view, simply because they’re so widely misunderstood. They’re also critical to get “right” if you want to protect your health, and the health of your loved ones. For more great advise, please review the two featured sources.
Sources:
- See more at: http://www.wakingtimes.com/2013/02/28/10-lies-and-misconceptions-spread-by-mainstream-nutrition/#sthash.KBAapO55.dpuf