Saturday, November 23, 2013

12 Fish You Should Never, Ever Eat


Steer clear of this seafood that's bad for you and the environment

Steer clear of this seafood that's bad for you and the environmentBy Emily Main, Prevention
 One fish, two fish, bad-for-you-fish. Yes fish, no fish, red fish…OK fish? Our oceans have become so depleted of wild fish stocks, and so polluted with industrial contaminants, that trying to figure out the fish that are both safe and sustainable can make your head spin. "Good fish" lists can change year after year, because stocks rebound or get depleted every few years, but there are some fish that, no matter what, you can always decline.

 The nonprofit Food and Water Watch looked at all the varieties of fish out there, how they were harvested, how certain species are farmed, and levels of toxic contaminants like mercury or PCBs in the fish, as well as how heavily local fishermen relied upon fisheries for their economic survival. It's perfect timing since fish is a staple at many holiday parties and celebrations. These are the 12 fish, they determined, that all of us should avoid, no matter what. 

PLUS: Which packaged goods aren't packed with toxins or preservatives? Find out the 100 Cleanest Packaged Foods.

1. Imported Catfish 

Why It's Bad: Nearly 90% of the catfish imported to the US comes from Vietnam, where use of antibiotics that are banned in the U.S. is widespread. Furthermore, the two varieties of Vietnamese catfish sold in the US, Swai and Basa, aren't technically considered catfish by the federal government and therefore aren't held to the same inspection rules that other imported catfish are.
Eat This Instead: Stick with domestic, farm-raised catfish, advises Marianne Cufone, director of the Fish Program at Food & Water Watch. It's responsibly farmed and plentiful, making it one of the best fish you can eat. Or, try Asian carp, an invasive species with a similar taste to catfish that's out-competing wild catfish and endangering the Great Lakes ecosystem.

2. Caviar 

Why It's Bad:
 Caviar from beluga and wild-caught sturgeon are susceptible to overfishing, according to the Food and Water Watch report, but the species are also being threatened by an increase in dam building that pollutes the water in which they live. All forms of caviar come from fish that take a long time to mature, which means that it takes a while for populations to rebound.
Eat This Instead: If you really love caviar, opt for fish eggs from American Lake Sturgeon or American Hackleback/Shovelnose Sturgeon caviar from the Mississippi River system.

BEWARE: 19 Foods That Aren't Food

3. Atlantic Cod 

Why It's Bad:
 This one was difficult to add to the "dirty dozen list," says Cufone, because it is so vital to the economic health of New England fishermen. "However, chronic mismanagement by the National Marine Fisheries Service and low stock status made it very difficult to recommend," she says. Atlantic cod stocks collapsed in the mid-1990s and are in such disarray that the species is now listed as one step above endangered on the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Threatened Species.
Eat This Instead: The good news, if you love fish 'n' chips (which is nearly always made with cod), is that Pacific cod stocks are still strong and are one of Food and Water Watch's best fish picks.

4. American Eel 

Why It's Bad:
Also called yellow or silver eel, this fish, which frequently winds up in sushi dishes, made its way onto the list because it's highly contaminated with PCBs and mercury. The fisheries are also suffering from some pollution and overharvesting.
Eat This Instead: If you like the taste of eel, opt for Atlantic- or Pacific-caught squid instead.
PLUS: 25 Best Weight-Loss Tips Of All Time

5. Imported Shrimp 

Why It's Bad:
Imported shrimp actually holds the designation of being the dirtiest of the Dirty Dozen, says Cufone, and it's hard to avoid, as 90% of shrimp sold in the U.S. is imported. "Imported farmed shrimp comes with a whole bevy of contaminants: antibiotics, residues from chemicals used to clean pens, filth like mouse hair, rat hair, and pieces of insects," Cufone says. "And I didn't even mention things like E. coli that have been detected in imported shrimp." Part of this has to do with the fact that less than 2% of ALL imported seafood (shrimp, crab, catfish, or others) gets inspected before its sold, which is why it's that much more important to buy domestic seafood. (Still need convincing? Find out the Top 5 Reasons You Should Never Eat Shrimp Again.)
Eat This Instead: Look for domestic shrimp. Seventy percent of domestic shrimp comes from the Gulf of Mexico, which relies heavily on shrimp for economic reasons. Pink shrimp from Oregon are another good choice; the fisheries there are certified under the stringent Marine Stewardship Council guidelines.

6. Atlantic Flatfish 

Why It's Bad:
 This group of fish includes flounder, sole, and halibut that are caught off the Atlantic coast. They found their way onto the list because of heavy contamination and overfishing that dates back to the 1800s. According to Food and Water Watch, populations of these fish are as low as 1% of what's necessary to be considered sustainable for long-term fishing.

Eat This Instead:
Pacific halibut seems to be doing well, but the group also recommends replacing these fish with other mild-flavored white-fleshed fish, such as domestically farmed catfish or tilapia.

7. Atlantic Salmon (both wild-caught and farmed) 

Why It's Bad:
 It's actually illegal to capture wild Atlantic salmon because the fish stocks are so low, and they're low, in part, because of farmed salmon. Salmon farming is very polluting: Thousands of fish are crammed into pens, which leads to the growth of diseases and parasites that require antibiotics and pesticides. Often, the fish escape and compete with native fish for food, leading to declines in native populations. Adding to our salmon woes, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is moving forward with approving genetically engineered salmon to be sold, unlabeled, to unsuspecting seafood lovers. That salmon would be farmed off the coast of Panama, and it's unclear how it would be labeled. Currently, all fish labeled "Atlantic salmon" come from fish farms.
Eat This Instead: Opt for wild Alaskan salmon now, and in the event that GE salmon is officially approved.

RELATED: To avoid the most pesticide-ridden produce items, check out these 5 Foods You Should Always Buy Organic.


8. Imported King Crab 

Why It's Bad:
 The biggest problem with imported crab is that most of it comes from Russia, where limits on fish harvests aren't strongly enforced. But this crab also suffers from something of an identity crisis, says Cufone: "Imported king crab is often misnamed Alaskan king crab, because most people think that's name of the crab," she says, adding that she's often seen labels at supermarkets that say "Alaskan King Crab, Imported." Alaskan king crab is a completely separate animal, she says, and it's much more responsibly harvested than the imported stuff.

Eat This Instead: When you shop for king crab, whatever the label says, ask whether it comes from Alaska or if it's imported. Approximately 70% of the king crab sold in the U.S. is imported, so it's important to make that distinction and go domestic.

9. Shark 

Why It's Bad:
Problems associated with our eating too many sharks happen at all stages of the food chain, says Cufone. For one, these predatory fish are extremely high in mercury, which poses threats to humans. But ocean ecosystems suffer, too. "With fewer sharks around, the species they eat, like cownose rays and jellyfish, have increased in numbers," Cufone says. "And the rays are eating--and depleting--scallops and other fish." There are fewer of those fish in the oceans for us to eat, placing an economic strain on coastal communities that depend on those fisheries.

Eat this instead:
 Among the recommendations for shark alternatives are Pacific halibut and Atlantic mackerel.

TRY THESE: 25 Delicious, Clean Detox Dishes

10. Orange Roughy 

Why It's Bad:
 In addition to having high levels of mercury, orange roughy can take between 20 and 40 years to reach full maturity and reproduces late in life, which makes it difficult for populations to recover from overfishing. Orange roughy has such a reputation for being overharvested that some large restaurant chains, including Red Lobster, refuse to serve it. However, it still pops up in grocer freezers, sometimes mislabeled as "sustainably harvested." There are no fisheries of orange roughy that are considered well-managed or are certified by the Marine Stewardship Council, so avoid any that you see.

Eat This Instead:
Opt for yellow snapper or domestic catfish to get the same texture as orange roughy in your recipes.

11. Atlantic Bluefin Tuna 

Why It's Bad: A recent analysis by The New York Times found that Atlantic bluefin tuna has the highest levels of mercury of any type of tuna. To top it off, bluefin tuna are severely overharvested, to the point of reaching near-extinction levels, and are considered "critically endangered" by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Rather than trying to navigate the ever-changing recommendations for which tuna is best, consider giving it up altogether and switching to a healthy, flavorful alternative, such as Alaska wild-caught salmon.

Eat This Instead:
If you really can't give up tuna, opt for American or Canadian (but not imported!) albacore tuna, which is caught while it's young and doesn't contain as high levels of mercury.

12. Chilean Sea Bass 

Why It's Bad:
 Most Chilean sea bass sold in the US comes from fishermen who have captured them illegally, although the US Department of State says that illegal harvesting of the fish has declined in recent years. Nevertheless, fish stocks are in such bad shape that the nonprofit Greenpeace estimates that, unless people stop eating this fish, the entire species could be commercially extinct within five years. Food and Water Watch's guide notes that these fish are high in mercury, as well.

Eat This Instead:
These fish are very popular and considered a delicacy, but you can get the same texture and feel with US hook-and-line-caught haddock. 

Thursday, November 21, 2013

Would you take a free house in Fukushima to raise your children, but you have to stay there for 5 years. Why not?

Clearly the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster is just that, a Disaster of Worldwide proportions.  This is not Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl or even 3 Mile Island!  

If nuclear fallout lasts thousands of years, how did Hiroshima and Nagasaki recover so quickly?.  See why.

They were miniscule in comparison.  Even Chernobyl does not compare to the destructive and disastrous effect that Fukushima will have on the world.  Call me an alarmist, if you would like.  Stop reading if you don't think there is some truth in what I'm saying here.  But think about this before you stop reading, What if there is some truth to this?  What would that mean for you?  I'm just asking for you to find out.  We can get through this but not without a plan.


"This is no time to bury your head in the Sand and think that Government will take care of this.  THEY DO NOT KNOW HOW!"

Do we have any business playing with something that we don't know how to handle?  Because we know how something works that does not mean should employee it in everyday use with unknown or acceptable consequences   I know a little about Fission and Fusion but I am certainly not going to build a reactor.  

Do we have any business working with something we no relatively little about?  That is exactly what we have been doing for 40 years +.  I can find all kinds of statistics about nuclear waste, nuclear power, nuclear everything.  But we know in our hearts of hearts if we are true to ourselves, that nuclear power is not the answer for cheap energy.  If its so cheap why are our energy cost going up?

Clearly the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster is just that, a Disaster of Worldwide proportions.   Problems are clear and obvious if you look into it.  What can we do now to ensure that it has little affect on the rest of the world.  You may be able to take care of yourself and your family, but what about the food you will eat or are eating right now.  Is it free of radioactive isotopes or Cesium?  You won't know until its too late.  Fukushima will be a dead environment for many, many years or decades if not centuries to come.  It is no Hiroshima or Nagasaki.  Chernobyl is not even close.

If you don't believe that,  What if I gave  you a house in Fukushima for you to live in, if they let you live there, would you take it?  There would be some conditions. You have to raise children there and you cannot leave that area for 5 years.  Would you take the free house?

NOW WHAT DO WE DO about it?

The answer is whatever it takes.  If you can not answer what ever it takes?  Then we have a problem.  We have a massive world wide problem.  What now!!

You don't hear much about the Nuclear power plants in the media, but that doesn't mean they are going  away.  In fact I believe that means it is far worse than they say it is.  Call me paranoid.  I am unconcerned about any names you may have for me.  What I am concerned about is BEGGING you to prepare for what this event has created and what to do about it for all our health. If you do not feel that way then by all means please quit reading and put your head back in the sand.  Go play a video game or watch the Simpsons or play on Facebook.  

Now for those of you that believe that this is a WORLD DISASTER, what is next?  What we can do is talk about it and demand that it be handled to the best of the World's governments abilities.  I mean DEMAND it.  This is not something that can be swept under the rug.  At least not for a few 10's of thousands of years!

I understand it is a scary proposition, but you had no decision in the matter but you have a decision to make now.  Wait for the government to tell you what to do, wait for it to affect you or fight for you and your families' lives.  Prepare yourselves. 

How much do you know about nuclear energy,power plants
Should we use it?

What do we do with spent fuel rods
This is life or death....Oh sure not death right away.  Gradual death from cancer,  thats much more acceptable.


Looking at how the Pacific Ocean currents flow it accurate to say that Japan's environment has an effect on the West Coast of The Unites States of America.  We need to take a hard look at this.  I am not a scientist but I can read current flow and I know Geography.

Chernobyl: 25 Years After The Nuclear Disaster (PHOTOS)


First Posted: 02/ 2/2011 8:48 am   Updated: 09/19/2011 9:47 pm

From iLCP:
This year marks the 25th Anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster. At 1:23am on April 26th, 1986, operators in the control room of Reactor #4 botched a routine safety test, resulting in an explosion, and a fire that burned for 10 days. The radioactive fallout spread over tens of thousands of square miles, driving more than a quarter of a million people permanently from their homes. It remains the world's worst nuclear disaster to date.
Since 1993, renowned National Geographic photographer Gerd Ludwig has visited the site several times, creating an in-depth look at the many consequences of tragedy. The thawing of bureaucratic barriers in Ukraine enabled him to move freely within the Exclusion Zone and delve deeper into contaminated reactor than any other Western still photographer. "I know that my explorations are not without personal risk. However," he says, "I do this on behalf of otherwise voiceless victims who allow me to expose their suffering solely in the hope that tragedies like Chernobyl may be prevented in the future."
This spring, Gerd Ludwig plans to return to the reactor and the areas around it to investigate the state of contamination to the land; to report on the progress of its cleanup; and to examine the health consequences in the fallout regions of Ukraine and Belarus. Harnessing social media outlets likeFacebook and Twitter, his project entitled The Long Shadow of Chernobyl is funded partially through the crowd-funding website Kickstarter, where individuals can pledge their support for the project.
1 of 12
Wind blows through the desolate town of Pripyat. On April 26, 1986, this amusement park was being readied for the annual May Day celebrations when the Chernobyl nuclear reactor exploded less than two miles away and severely contaminated tens of thousands of square miles. 

The Long Shadow of Chernobyl - Photographs © Gerd Ludwig/INSTITUTE